Iktibar perbezaan pandangan wacana dunia dan lokal tentang status keselamatan bandar Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Pemahaman tentang penilaian keselamatan bandar agak mengelirukan dan sering kali berlaku percanggahan kesimpulan antara wacana antarabangsa dengan tempatan. Diperhatikan luar negara menilai Kuala Lumpur (KL), Malaysia, sebagai ‘bandar sederhana rendah selamat’ ( below average ), tetapi tempatan melihat KL selamat yang sangat sesuai untuk didiami. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini cuba memahami jurang perbezaan wujud dalam serta aspek-aspek boleh dipelajari daripada kedua-dua pihak. Artikel mengguna pakai kaedah kes berpandukan jadual matriks perbandingan, analisis jarak nilai min, skor. Hasil menunjukkan bahawa institusi sudut lebih meluas seperti ekonomi, pelaburan, pelancongan, berdasarkan lima aspek keselamatan, iaitu awam, peribadi, kesihatan, infrastruktur, digital. Sebaliknya, sarjana menjurus kepada faktor lokal dekat kehendak penduduk, pelaksanaan Crime Prevention through Environmental Design , pencegahan jenayah, keberkesanan program selamat. Walau bagaimanapun, didapati penarafan di mata dunia tidak begitu diambil berat oleh penduduk kerana mereka hidup keadaan sejahtera kes-kes jenayah sekitar berada pada tahap terkawal. Pada pendapat pengkaji, pandangan perlu dijadikan iktibar harus dipandang ringan, manakala adaptasi terhadap kebimbangan ke atas diteliti. Kajian merupakan pertama menyumbangkan perbandingan perspektif berkenaan konsep khasnya KL. Kata kunci: Adaptasi jenayah; selamat, Design, Social Development kesejahteraan hidup, Malaysia The understanding of urban safety assessments is somewhat confusing, and conflicting conclusions often arise between international local discourse. Observing the city foreign discourse evaluates as a ‘medium low-safe city’ (below average). However, sees safe that highly suitable to live in. Accordingly, this study attempts understand extent which differences exist in evaluating KL, what perceptions can be understood from an examination both parties. This article adopts case method based on comparison matrixes, distance mean values score analysis. results show institutions view topic broader perspective (usually economic, investment tourism perspective), evaluate according five aspects security, namely public safety, personal, health, infrastructure Meanwhile, scholars focus more factors, their approach involves needs population, implementation crime prevention effectiveness programmes. it was found rating eyes world receives less attention locals, long lives are prosperous, criminal cases kept at controlled level around them. In opinion researchers, should regarded instructive not underestimated, while adaptation fear studied. first contribute perspectives concept specifically, Keywords: Adaptation crime, cities, Development, society wellbeing,